Date: Tue, 17 Jan 2012 16:05:27 +0000 From: Chris Rees <utisoft@gmail.com> To: Atom Smasher <atom@smasher.org> Cc: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: FreeBSD has serious problems with focus, longevity, and lifecycle Message-ID: <CADLo838h13c9Md-Qb5Pu%2BPSN1C=VNrNWgN-L%2Brq_XwFy83DWHA@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <alpine.DEB.2.00.1201171931120.21214@oreo.lan> References: <alpine.BSF.2.00.1112211415580.19710@kozubik.com> <1326756727.23485.10.camel@Arawn> <4F14BAA7.9070707@freebsd.org> <alpine.BSF.2.00.1201161606230.19710@kozubik.com> <20120117010239.GA29529@richh-imac.office.boxdice.com.au> <alpine.DEB.2.00.1201171931120.21214@oreo.lan>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 17 Jan 2012 13:38, "Atom Smasher" <atom@smasher.org> wrote: > > On Tue, 17 Jan 2012, richo wrote: > >> This would be a different argument if all the devs were paid a salary. > > ============== > > what percentage of linux devs are on salary to develop linux? > You're not comparing like with like. Linux is not an OS; FreeBSD is. Are you talking about Linux? Debian? Red Hat? Chris
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?CADLo838h13c9Md-Qb5Pu%2BPSN1C=VNrNWgN-L%2Brq_XwFy83DWHA>