Date: Thu, 20 Nov 1997 15:40:09 +0000 (GMT) From: Stephen Roome <steve@visint.co.uk> To: Jamie Bowden <jamie@itribe.net> Cc: freebsd-chat@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Tell the world about Year 2000 Compliance Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.3.95.971120153906.395E-100000@dylan.visint.co.uk> In-Reply-To: <199711201453.JAA00792@gatekeeper.itribe.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Thu, 20 Nov 1997, Jamie Bowden wrote: > Why is it wrong to assume 2000 isn't a leap year? Last time I checked, > years ending in three 0's were not leap years by definition. A year is a leap year if it's divisible by 4 and not 100, OR if it's divisible by 400. Check www.gmt2000.com for more details, they point out that 2000 is a leap year even though a lot of people have been confused. Steve. Steve Roome - Vision Interactive Ltd. Tel:+44(0)117 9730597 Home:+44(0)976 241342 WWW: http://dylan.visint.co.uk/
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.BSF.3.95.971120153906.395E-100000>