Date: Sun, 3 Jul 2005 21:59:37 -0400 From: Garrett Wollman <wollman@csail.mit.edu> To: des@des.no (=?iso-8859-1?q?Dag-Erling_Sm=F8rgrav?=) Cc: freebsd-security@FreeBSD.ORG, Jesper Wallin <jesper@www.hackunite.net> Subject: Re: packets with syn/fin vs pf_norm.c Message-ID: <17096.38921.588487.576918@khavrinen.csail.mit.edu> In-Reply-To: <86fyuvv1bm.fsf@xps.des.no> References: <42C70FED.8080003@hackunite.net> <86fyuvv1bm.fsf@xps.des.no>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
<<On Mon, 04 Jul 2005 02:53:33 +0200, des@des.no (Dag-Erling Sm=F8rgrav= ) said: > It is not invalid for a TCP segment to have both SYN and FIN set. Se= e > for instance RFC 1644. RFC 793 is perhaps the better reference, followed by RFC 1025. -GAWollman
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?17096.38921.588487.576918>