Date: Mon, 5 Mar 2001 15:06:40 -0800 From: "David O'Brien" <obrien@FreeBSD.org> To: John Baldwin <jhb@FreeBSD.org> Cc: Alfred Perlstein <bright@wintelcom.net>, hackers@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: fixing flex definitions? Message-ID: <20010305150639.A23106@dragon.nuxi.com> In-Reply-To: <XFMail.010305145522.jhb@FreeBSD.org>; from jhb@FreeBSD.org on Mon, Mar 05, 2001 at 02:55:22PM -0800 References: <20010305144823.B8663@fw.wintelcom.net> <XFMail.010305145522.jhb@FreeBSD.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Mon, Mar 05, 2001 at 02:55:22PM -0800, John Baldwin wrote:
> I'm guessing YY_PROTO is like __P() so it can be "compilable with a K&R Old
> Testament compiler."
Yes. And in this case, the output of lex *must* be portable to K&R.
--
-- David (obrien@FreeBSD.org)
GNU is Not Unix / Linux Is Not UniX
To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20010305150639.A23106>