Date: Fri, 06 Jun 2003 09:28:18 +0200 From: Dag-Erling Smorgrav <des@ofug.org> To: Rahul Siddharthan <rsidd@online.fr> Cc: chat@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Peeve: why "i386"? Message-ID: <xzpsmqnhdgt.fsf@flood.ping.uio.no> In-Reply-To: <20030605165217.A388@online.fr> (Rahul Siddharthan's message of "Thu, 5 Jun 2003 16:52:17 -0400") References: <20030605165217.A388@online.fr>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Rahul Siddharthan <rsidd@online.fr> writes: > Why do all the BSDs continue to refer to the 32 bit Intel architecture > as i386 Because that's what everybody else calls it. > even when they typically won't even install on an i386 any > more? They do. DES -- Dag-Erling Smorgrav - des@ofug.org
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?xzpsmqnhdgt.fsf>