Date: Fri, 04 Aug 2006 14:07:36 +0900 From: Hajimu UMEMOTO <ume@FreeBSD.org> To: freebsd-cvs-src@oldach.net (Helge Oldach) Cc: scottl@samsco.org, src-committers@FreeBSD.org, Hajimu UMEMOTO <ume@FreeBSD.org>, cvs-src@FreeBSD.org, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org, kensmith@cse.Buffalo.EDU Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/sys/sys param.h src/include Makefile netdb.h res_update.h resolv.h src/include/arpa inet.h nameser.h nameser Message-ID: <ygefygdnl5z.wl%ume@mahoroba.org> In-Reply-To: <200608030536.k735aIT3081092@sep.oldach.net> References: <ygelkqrr1lv.wl%ume@mahoroba.org> <200608030536.k735aIT3081092@sep.oldach.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Hi,
>>>>> On Thu, 3 Aug 2006 07:36:18 +0200 (CEST)
>>>>> Helge Oldach <freebsd-cvs-src@oldach.net> said:
freebsd-cvs-src> Well... I've spotted a regression not with the ports tree but with
freebsd-cvs-src> 6-STABLE. On several boxes with this change applied I see lots of
freebsd-cvs-src> sendmails stacking up over time, for example:
Could you show me your resolv.conf? Are all nameservers listed in
your resolv.conf available?
freebsd-cvs-src> On one busy sendmail box I've seen literally thousands of such
freebsd-cvs-src> processes. Note that these processes don't disappear, so it is not
freebsd-cvs-src> related to sendmail.cf's timeouts.
Dou you mean that the processes are never disappered except killing
them? Which status are they?
Sincerely,
--
Hajimu UMEMOTO @ Internet Mutual Aid Society Yokohama, Japan
ume@mahoroba.org ume@{,jp.}FreeBSD.org
http://www.imasy.org/~ume/
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?ygefygdnl5z.wl%ume>