Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Mon, 4 Jan 1999 00:13:51 +0200 (EET)
From:      Vladimir Kushnir <kushn@mail.kar.net>
To:        Wiliam Woods <wwoods@cybcon.com>
Cc:        FBSD_QUESTIONS <questions@FreeBSD.ORG>, FBSD_CURRENT <freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG>
Subject:   Re: pgcc-1.1.1 
Message-ID:  <Pine.BSF.4.05.9901040005470.34115-100000@kushnir.kiev.ua>
In-Reply-To: <005501be3737$d091d620$f301040a@c063.beaverton.stream.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sun, 3 Jan 1999, Wiliam Woods wrote:

> Anyone here useing pgcc-1.1.1 as their compiler of choice, to replace gcc? I
> have been debating playing with this on my "spare" system.
> Any reports from someone useing this, good or bad?

Not sure if I'd like to replace gcc, especially for kernel, but I'm using
pgcc (both C, and C++, and g77) for userland here, mostly as a matter of
speed-up (yep, I know that's not what egcs is intended for, but all the
same some of us need fast code). Works fine. Only question: does anybody
know why Linux cross-compiled (within emulation) code runs _much_ faster?

> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Bill
> 
> 

Regards,
Vladimir


===========================|=======================
 Vladimir Kushnir   	   |	
 kushn@mail.kar.net, 	   |	Powered by FreeBSD
 kushnir@ap3.bitp.kiev.ua  |


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.BSF.4.05.9901040005470.34115-100000>