Date: Sun, 28 Feb 2016 14:02:03 +0000 From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 207530] net-mgmt/super_mediator Message-ID: <bug-207530-13-Wvk1JCiVwh@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/> In-Reply-To: <bug-207530-13@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/> References: <bug-207530-13@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D207530 Raphael Kubo da Costa <rakuco@FreeBSD.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Keywords| |easy, needs-qa, patch Status|New |Open CC| |rakuco@FreeBSD.org --- Comment #1 from Raphael Kubo da Costa <rakuco@FreeBSD.org> --- Thanks for the contribution. Can you please adjust the following: - Set a more descriptive title for the bug. New ports generally have the following format: "[new port] category/portname: <text in COMMENT>". - Set the "maintainer-flag+" flag in your attachment so that it shows up in= the "Ports: Maintainer Approved" saved search in Bugzilla. - Regenerate your new port using shar instead of a tarball, as described he= re: https://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/porters-handbook/book.htm= l#porting-submitting As for the port itself, I suggest you run portlint -AC on it. There are ext= ra empty lines, lack of tabs in some places and stale comments that could be removed (like the "PKG_DEPENDS" ones). It also help you post here the results of calling "portlint -AC" and one or more Poudriere build results. --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.=
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?bug-207530-13-Wvk1JCiVwh>