Date: Tue, 05 Jan 2016 00:40:26 -0500 From: "Mikhail T." <mi+thun@aldan.algebra.com> To: Bruce Evans <brde@optusnet.com.au> Cc: freebsd-fs <freebsd-fs@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: NFS reads vs. writes Message-ID: <568B574A.7010603@aldan.algebra.com> In-Reply-To: <20160105143542.X1191@besplex.bde.org> References: <8291bb85-bd01-4c8c-80f7-2adcf9947366@email.android.com> <5688D3C1.90301@aldan.algebra.com> <495055121.147587416.1451871433217.JavaMail.zimbra@uoguelph.ca> <568A047B.1010000@aldan.algebra.com> <CAGtEZUD28UZDYyHtHtzXgys%2Brpv_37u4fotwR%2BqZLc1%2BtK0dwA@mail.gmail.com> <20160105143542.X1191@besplex.bde.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 05.01.2016 00:19, Bruce Evans wrote:
>>> It is a chunk of an older SSD, that also houses the OS. But it is
>>> usually idle, because executables and libraries are cached in the
>>> abundant RAM. I've seen it do 90+Mb/s (sequential)...
>
> Please be more careful with units (but don't use MiB's; I should killfile
> that). 90 Mbits/s is still slow.
Mb is megabyte in my book. This is the unit used by `systat -vm', which
I mentioned earlier. 90 megabytes/s is still not at the limit of Gigabit
Ethernet, however, but it is a lot closer to it.
Yours,
-mi
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?568B574A.7010603>