Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Sun, 23 Jul 2006 17:08:53 -0400 (EDT)
From:      Daniel Eischen <deischen@freebsd.org>
To:        Michael Nottebrock <lofi@freebsd.org>
Cc:        freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org, freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org, kmacy@fsmware.com
Subject:   Re: WINE vs. FreeBSD
Message-ID:  <Pine.GSO.4.64.0607231708230.9403@sea.ntplx.net>
In-Reply-To: <200607232143.24374.lofi@freebsd.org>
References:  <200607221914.15826.lofi@freebsd.org> <200607222341.05180.lofi@freebsd.org> <Pine.GSO.4.64.0607221912140.4394@sea.ntplx.net> <200607232143.24374.lofi@freebsd.org>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sun, 23 Jul 2006, Michael Nottebrock wrote:

> On Sunday, 23. July 2006 01:15, Daniel Eischen wrote:
>> On Sat, 22 Jul 2006, Michael Nottebrock wrote:
>>> On Saturday, 22. July 2006 21:20, Kip Macy wrote:
>
>> I think it is because WINE stomps on or TLS.  Nothing we can
>> do about that except patch wine so it doesn't.  Look at the
>> console messages for:
>>
>>    Warning: pid XXX used static ldt allocation
>
> Yes, it does indeed trigger those - lots of them.

This is a problem with the way WINE is built or something.
It is not a threads problem.  Please close the PR.

Thanks,

-- 
DE



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.GSO.4.64.0607231708230.9403>