Date: Wed, 7 Feb 2007 20:28:17 +1030 From: "Daniel O'Connor" <doconnor@gsoft.com.au> To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Cc: Boris Samorodov <bsam@ipt.ru>, Artem Kuchin <matrix@itlegion.ru> Subject: Re: Filesystem corruption and bad perfomance with SRCS16 and PAE ( raid 5 2TB) Message-ID: <200702072028.42216.doconnor@gsoft.com.au> In-Reply-To: <013c01c74a95$ca217000$0c00a8c0@Artem> References: <001d01c74a27$25afd9d0$0c00a8c0@Artem> <21342944@srv.sem.ipt.ru> <013c01c74a95$ca217000$0c00a8c0@Artem>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--nextPart2053819.Y63mYyM94I Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline On Wednesday 07 February 2007 19:23, Artem Kuchin wrote: > FreeBSD/amd64 is a very young platform on FreeBSD. While the core FreeBSD > kernel and base system components are generally fairly robust, there are > likely to still be rough edges, particularly with third party packages." > > scares me. Do you really think it is better than PAE? PAE is quite young as well, I think it was committed to the tree around Mar= ch=20 2003. The earliest AMD64 commit I could find was May 2003 although repo=20 copying makes it confusing.. I think you'll find the list of drivers incompatible with PAE to be much=20 longer with amd64. =2D-=20 Daniel O'Connor software and network engineer for Genesis Software - http://www.gsoft.com.au "The nice thing about standards is that there are so many of them to choose from." -- Andrew Tanenbaum GPG Fingerprint - 5596 B766 97C0 0E94 4347 295E E593 DC20 7B3F CE8C --nextPart2053819.Y63mYyM94I Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQBFyaLS5ZPcIHs/zowRAtqdAJ0SrdE9Ig1ysW9GHSXxiXKzQ4LG5gCfd3NW XeJiSYNv2/c6nbLRWTbKVUs= =TR5H -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --nextPart2053819.Y63mYyM94I--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200702072028.42216.doconnor>