Date: Mon, 16 May 2005 15:13:25 -0700 From: Danny Howard <dannyman@toldme.com> To: Pawel Jakub Dawidek <pjd@FreeBSD.org> Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: gmirror Message-ID: <42891B05.3010107@toldme.com> In-Reply-To: <20050514175855.GD837@darkness.comp.waw.pl> References: <20050514093217.C6088E082A@oak.tantieme.ru> <20050514131648.GB837@darkness.comp.waw.pl> <4200469905051406572de39b47@mail.gmail.com> <20050514141605.GC837@darkness.comp.waw.pl> <4200469905051407486f241a65@mail.gmail.com> <4d454d044d57b9f62c8dd51c3f077b38@ee.ryerson.ca> <20050514175855.GD837@darkness.comp.waw.pl>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Pawel Jakub Dawidek wrote: >On Sat, May 14, 2005 at 11:36:04AM -0400, David Magda wrote: >+> >+> On May 14, 2005, at 10:48, Vladimir Dzhivsanoff wrote: >+> >+> >On 5/14/05, Pawel Jakub Dawidek <pjd@freebsd.org> wrote: >+> >>There is my tool in ports (benchmarks/raidtest/) which does what you >+> >>want. >+> >>The README file wasn't moved to ports, IIRC, you can find it here: >+> >> >+> >big thanks, Pawel >+> >+> You may also want to check out Bonnie and Bonnie++. They're fairly >+> standard I/O benchmark programs that are a staple in measuring >+> performance. Bonnie is in the Ports tree. > >It measures file system performance, so it is basically not this level, >but could be useful too. > > > The desired result, in the end, is "filesystem performance" ... so if you can make a distinction between the various implementations you can implement, this is perhaps the most useful metric. -danny -- http://dannyman.toldme.com/
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?42891B05.3010107>