Date: Fri, 11 Jan 2008 19:19:56 +0000 From: "Igor Mozolevsky" <igor@hybrid-lab.co.uk> To: "Kevin Oberman" <oberman@es.net> Cc: bruno@freebsd.org, =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Dag-Erling_Sm=F8rgrav?= <des@des.no>, njl@freebsd.org, freebsd-current@freebsd.org, Stefan Lambrev <stefan.lambrev@moneybookers.com> Subject: Re: powerd adaptive mode latching Message-ID: <a2b6592c0801111119r148d3697hf75a59b7bf74d540@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <20080111181344.5E7244500E@ptavv.es.net> References: <a2b6592c0801110351l382959ffh1d55f2bcd2e6ca1b@mail.gmail.com> <20080111181344.5E7244500E@ptavv.es.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 11/01/2008, Kevin Oberman <oberman@es.net> wrote: > > I was also thinking that the power increase probably shouldn't be > > linear, maybe there should be a choice of algs: 2-step, 50%-100%, etc. > > Normally you don't mind power dropping slowly, but for most things you > > don't want to wait N-seconds for the clock to be stepped up to its > > full throttle... > > Try your idea and see how it works. It's always the question of time more than anything, I'll try something next week if I have the time, but no promises yet. :-) Igor
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?a2b6592c0801111119r148d3697hf75a59b7bf74d540>