Date: Thu, 15 May 2003 22:24:04 -0600 From: Scott Long <scott_long@btc.adaptec.com> To: obrien@freebsd.org Cc: "M. Warner Losh" <imp@bsdimp.com> Subject: Re: Moving the generation of foodevs.h to build time Message-ID: <3EC467E4.6050707@btc.adaptec.com> In-Reply-To: <20030516041506.GA82545@dragon.nuxi.com> References: <20030513.001815.55840081.imp@bsdimp.com> <20030516031317.GC38966@dragon.nuxi.com> <20030515.220304.68038616.imp@bsdimp.com> <20030516041506.GA82545@dragon.nuxi.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
David O'Brien wrote:
> On Thu, May 15, 2003 at 10:03:04PM -0600, M. Warner Losh wrote:
>
>>In message: <20030516031317.GC38966@dragon.nuxi.com>
>> "David O'Brien" <obrien@freebsd.org> writes:
>>: On Tue, May 13, 2003 at 12:18:15AM -0600, M. Warner Losh wrote:
>>: > OK. Here's a start at moving it. First, we have to move
>>: > devlist2h.awk out of tools back to dev/mii/devlist2h.awk. It
>>: > shouldn't be in tool if it only generates MII code,
>>:
>>: Why shouldn't it be a tool if it only generates MII code?
>>: Can't we just rename all the devlist2h.awk's to
>>: @/tools/${_dev}-devlist2h.awk?
>>
>>I can paint this bikeshed either way. tools/devlist2h.awk isn't the
>>right name/place for it. I don't care if we do a
>>${_dev}-devlist2h.awk or dev/${_dev}/devlist2h.awk. Arguments can be
>>made either way.
>
>
> Should we commit this patch (in some form) for 5.1 or after 5.1?
> _______________________________________________
> freebsd-arch@freebsd.org mailing list
> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-arch
> To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-arch-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"
Let's wait until after 5.1. It looks like a decent idea, though.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?3EC467E4.6050707>