Date: Mon, 28 Jul 1997 16:30:30 -0700 (PDT) From: Vincent Poy <vince@mail.MCESTATE.COM> To: "Matthew N. Dodd" <winter@jurai.net> Cc: security@FreeBSD.ORG, JbHunt <johnnyu@accessus.net>, "[Mario1-]" <mario1@PrimeNet.Com> Subject: Re: security hole in FreeBSD Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.3.95.970728162901.3844D-100000@mail.MCESTATE.COM> In-Reply-To: <Pine.BSF.3.95q.970728191758.25254G-100000@sasami.jurai.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Mon, 28 Jul 1997, Matthew N. Dodd wrote: =)On Mon, 28 Jul 1997, Vincent Poy wrote: =)> True but if you needed to compile -current, you would need to =)> remove the schg flags on some binaries before the make world. =) =)I was under the impression that doing a 'make world' in multiuser mode =)wasn't optimal. I know but when all the admins are remote, it has to be done multiuser. Is there a way to push the secure level up to 2 and then push it down when a make world is needed? Cheers, Vince - vince@MCESTATE.COM - vince@GAIANET.NET ________ __ ____ Unix Networking Operations - FreeBSD-Real Unix for Free / / / / | / |[__ ] GaiaNet Corporation - M & C Estate / / / / | / | __] ] Beverly Hills, California USA 90210 / / / / / |/ / | __] ] HongKong Stars/Gravis UltraSound Mailing Lists Admin /_/_/_/_/|___/|_|[____]
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.BSF.3.95.970728162901.3844D-100000>