Date: Thu, 04 Mar 2004 01:02:06 +0300 From: Roman Kurakin <rik@cronyx.ru> To: "M. Warner Losh" <imp@bsdimp.com> Cc: nyan@jp.FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/share/man/man4/man4.i386 ct.4 Message-ID: <404655DE.4060204@cronyx.ru> References: <4046058E.3090900@cronyx.ru> <20040304015305Q.matusita@jp.FreeBSD.org> <20040303.102155.38697537.imp@bsdimp.com> <20040303.104935.73668905.imp@bsdimp.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Correct me if I am wrong. Renaming of one of the devices would solve naming problems but it would hit one group of users. I think there is a compromis 1. If we have PC98, man4.i386 wouldn't appear in such installation. So man ct wouldn't confuse scsi ct users. 2. If we have i386 installation and man for scsi ct would be added we just need something like man4.pc98 to put it there and it would be hidden in i386 arch for Cronyx/Tau users. Roman M. Warner Losh wrote: >P.S. I accept responsibility for creating this conflict. I thought it >would be OK. I also knew of the two ct drivers for a long time, but >didn't think it would be an issue given that they were in different >domains. > >Let's continue to work towards resolving the issue (and the bigger >issue it exposes). > >Warner > > > > >
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?404655DE.4060204>