Date: Sat, 19 Jan 2002 22:06:36 +0300 From: "Andrey A. Chernov" <ache@nagual.pp.ru> To: Mark Murray <mark@grondar.za> Cc: Dag-Erling Smorgrav <des@ofug.org>, cvs-committers@FreeBSD.org, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: For all who miss it, PAM changes explanation reposted Message-ID: <20020119190636.GE12683@nagual.pp.ru> In-Reply-To: <200201191854.g0JIs0t23495@grimreaper.grondar.org> References: <20020119184423.GC12683@nagual.pp.ru> <200201191854.g0JIs0t23495@grimreaper.grondar.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sat, Jan 19, 2002 at 18:53:59 +0000, Mark Murray wrote:
>
> Ok - read the document. It tells you which are allowable. You can read,
> you are a programmer - you are writing the code. Yo decide which is the
> most appropriate one (from the allowable list) and use that.
From my point of view, the only appropriate for this case error code from
valid pam_sm_authenticate() error codes list in pam_modules.sgml is:
<tag><tt/PAM_CRED_INSUFFICIENT/</tag>
For some reason the application does not have sufficient
credentials to authenticate the user.
All other codes looks even less appropriate as pam_opie() return.
But if you say that you like another code better, than my choice, I agree
with you.
--
Andrey A. Chernov
http://ache.pp.ru/
To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe cvs-all" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20020119190636.GE12683>