Date: Fri, 28 May 2004 02:35:31 +0100 From: Colin Percival <colin.percival@wadham.ox.ac.uk> To: Hiroki Sato <hrs@FreeBSD.org> Cc: cvs-all@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/share/misc bsd-family-tree Message-ID: <6.1.0.6.1.20040528023341.03f51888@popserver.sfu.ca> In-Reply-To: <200405280012.i4S0CcRJ063336@repoman.freebsd.org> References: <200405280012.i4S0CcRJ063336@repoman.freebsd.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
At 01:12 28/05/2004, Hiroki Sato wrote: > Modified files: > share/misc bsd-family-tree > Log: > Add FreeBSD 4.10-RELEASE. Is there any reason why we can't have the 4.x and 5.x releases included in the correct relative positions? As far as I'm aware, the rest of the file is sorted by date. Colin Percival
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?6.1.0.6.1.20040528023341.03f51888>