Date: Fri, 25 May 2001 08:25:29 +0200 From: Udo Erdelhoff <ue@nathan.ruhr.de> To: freebsd-doc@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Problems with the automatic links Message-ID: <20010525082529.B29681@nathan.ruhr.de> In-Reply-To: <20010524174252.B51943@catkin.nothing-going-on.org>; from nik@freebsd.org on Thu, May 24, 2001 at 05:42:53PM %2B0100 References: <20010524132051.A25181@nathan.ruhr.de> <20010524174252.B51943@catkin.nothing-going-on.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--Sr1nOIr3CvdE5hEN Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Thu, May 24, 2001 at 05:42:53PM +0100, Nik Clayton wrote: > On Thu, May 24, 2001 at 01:20:51PM +0200, Udo Erdelhoff wrote: > > > > Using &man.foo.bar; inside <question> has intresting side effects for t= he > > TOCs: > > [...] > >=20 > > Solution: Like I said earler: Well, don't do that. The neccessary patch= es > > are already in my version of the FAQ and will be committed "soon". >=20 > Don't commit them. Dima's been working on some changes to the > stylesheets that will allow the link-generating code to know whether or > not it's in the middle of another link, and act accordingly. Sorry, but I got your messages some time after committing the last round of markup changes. If neccessary, I'll revert the changes to the questions but I'd prefer to leave them in the FAQ > > The second problem is somewhat tricky: We have several entities for > > programs found in the ports collection. Using them results in a link of > > this form: > >=20 > > [...] >=20 > Looking at the various content models, <citerefentry> supports a > "vendor" attribute, which might be appropriate (actually, so does > <refentrytitle> and <manvolnum>). I *really* need my own electronic copy of the Docbook book... =20 > So the user would write; >=20 > <citerefentry vendor=3D"XFree86"> > <refentrytitle>X</refentrytitle> > <manvolnum>1</manvolnum> > </citerefentry> >=20 > and we have to come up with a list of recognised vendors. Sounds good. =20 > Here's a proof of concept implementation (I've got a load of cruft in my > local freebsd.dsl, so these are cut-n-paste, not patches). [patches snipped] That seems to be exactly what I dreamed of. I'll give them a spin after work... /s/Udo (has to torture some Sun boxes) --=20 Enjoy the beauty and power of root --Sr1nOIr3CvdE5hEN Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.0.4 (FreeBSD) Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org iQCVAwUBOw362EPoh1XnT6hxAQH/MgQAxkz/YD1wov34U0FJgqYCL4mhLRV+cXDh DbgXxK2Pnx+RKInBcbeL/ox8/TTuHfgu6x6/q5QcTWp8WK+hBfMhvw3ShPTXO2tJ 2s8A0ZmWLJ/qErV5YsFoJqdCZ+1tNT9vw06Tlj9V4uNnmCZdTCMfFFu+Dgh+bDBq 8f0OgLeKSeM= =GyWQ -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Sr1nOIr3CvdE5hEN-- To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-doc" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20010525082529.B29681>