Date: Fri, 26 Aug 2011 16:32:28 -0700 From: Patrick Mahan <mahan@mahan.org> To: Sergey Kandaurov <pluknet@gmail.com> Cc: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Usage of IFQ_DEQUEUE vs IFQ_DRV_DEQUEUE Message-ID: <4E582D0C.50100@mahan.org> In-Reply-To: <CAE-mSO%2BhF-UTq%2BTQaxrf7p8gggF%2B53Qv9ZA3ckDwOmLNsfzCBA@mail.gmail.com> References: <4E553F29.7020101@mahan.org> <CAE-mSO%2BhF-UTq%2BTQaxrf7p8gggF%2B53Qv9ZA3ckDwOmLNsfzCBA@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 8/24/11 11:42 AM, Sergey Kandaurov wrote: > On 24 August 2011 22:12, Patrick Mahan <mahan@mahan.org> wrote: >> Can somebody confirm my assumption on the following: >> >> If I am supporting ALTQ in a driver, then I should use the >> IFQ_DRV_DEQUEUE() macro. If I am not supporting ALTQ then >> it is okay IFQ_DEQUEUE() macro? If not what's the difference? >> >> Slightly confused... >> > > Just in case, have you read man 9 altq? It has a good description of > these macros. > Sergey, That is exactly what I was looking for. Don't know how I missed that (sometimes get caught up in looking at the source) Thanks, Patrick
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?4E582D0C.50100>