Date: Mon, 28 May 2012 22:28:23 +0200 From: Alexander Leidinger <Alexander@Leidinger.net> To: Peter Jeremy <peter@rulingia.com> Cc: Dmitry Marakasov <amdmi3@amdmi3.ru>, freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: OptionalObsoleteFiles.inc completeness Message-ID: <20120528222823.0000305c@unknown> In-Reply-To: <20120528200403.GB15356@server.rulingia.com> References: <20120527140541.GL2987@hades.panopticon> <20120528094427.GE2675@aspire.rulingia.com> <20120528195542.GB85856@hades.panopticon> <20120528200403.GB15356@server.rulingia.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Tue, 29 May 2012 06:04:03 +1000 Peter Jeremy <peter@rulingia.com> wrote: > My experience is that it now takes about 2=BD minutes on 10.x with warm > caches, compared to less than 1 second on 8.x. For most of that time, > there's no output and there's no warning of the increased time. I > actually wrote about the poor performance here a couple of weeks ago. One solution may be to remove some really old files. If we assume that we only support updates to major version X from the last release of major version X-1 we could maybe remove everything which was already obsolete in major version X-1 (or X-2 if you want to play safe). Bye, Alexander. --=20 http://www.Leidinger.net Alexander @ Leidinger.net: PGP ID =3D B0063FE7 http://www.FreeBSD.org netchild @ FreeBSD.org : PGP ID =3D 72077137
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20120528222823.0000305c>