Date: Sun, 5 May 2002 21:52:25 -0400 From: The Anarcat <anarcat@anarcat.dyndns.org> To: Max Okumoto <okumoto@ucsd.edu> Cc: freebsd-libh@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Does anyone mind if I start moving the interface builder code int bin? Message-ID: <20020506015225.GC393@lenny.anarcat.dyndns.org> In-Reply-To: <hfadrfza3u.fsf@multivac.sdsc.edu> References: <hfadrfza3u.fsf@multivac.sdsc.edu>
index | next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail
[-- Attachment #1 --] On Sat May 04, 2002 at 05:55:49PM -0700, Max Okumoto wrote: > > I am trying to seperate the build system from the libh core. Does > anyone mind if I move the HSystem stuff out of libh/lib/tcl into > libh/bin/glue_bulder ? Hmm.... I guess it's appropriate. But bin/? I'm not sure. Maybe a new libexec? bin should be reserved for installed binaries. Even libh's init(8) isn't in bin. libexec, maybe? I also don't like glue_builder (if that's what you meant) very much. But I don't have much better ideas, just suggestions: tcl_glue, tclh_glue? But I'm just ranting, just go ahead. If you can isolate the "build system" from the libh core, it would be a Good Thing (tm), I think. Just don't put it in bin/ :) A. -- The idea that Bill Gates has appeared like a knight in shining armour to lead all customers out of a mire of technological chaos neatly ignores the fact that it was he who, by peddling second-rate technology, led them into it in the first place. - Douglas Adams (1952-2001) [-- Attachment #2 --] -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (FreeBSD) Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org iEYEARECAAYFAjzV4dgACgkQttcWHAnWiGfFJgCeKeWfSnoxQk9F3p2hr+DHF0Qk bc4Ani7JiPTaP8/tnWh6R4kXgdxRC+Sb =zdXJ -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----help
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20020506015225.GC393>