Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Fri, 30 Jul 2004 02:36:07 +0200
From:      Eugene <eugene3@web.de>
To:        Scot Hetzel <swhetzel@gmail.com>
Cc:        freebsd-current@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: did gbde on swap destroy some boot sectors?
Message-ID:  <410997F7.30605@web.de>
In-Reply-To: <790a9fff04072912241219b5c2@mail.gmail.com>
References:  <410941AC.8010609@web.de> <790a9fff04072912241219b5c2@mail.gmail.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Scot Hetzel wrote:

>>my swap labels are the following ones...
>>
>>/dev/da0s1b
>>/dev/da1s1b
>>/dev/da2s1b
>>
> 
> What we should be looking at are the disklabels for those devices:
> 
>    disklabel /dev/da0s1
> 
> As the swap partition could be overlapping with your root partition. 
> Then when your system crashed, the system wrote to the end of your
> swap partition, which wrote over your root partition.

i configured the labels some moths ago from within sysinstall when i 
installed freebsd, they realy shouldnt overlap. im heavily using my 
swap, so it should have crashed earlier that root label...

> 
> 
>>and they are located at the very beginning of all hard drives for speed
>>reasons...
>>
> 
> Actually, you want your swap partition as close to the center of the
> hard drive as possible to minimize the movement of the drive heads,
> thus increasing the speed.
> 
> Scot

seems i was too fixated onto continouously read/write speed alone being 
faster at the beginning ignoring the reposition of the heads from label 
to label... but i still guess there is a chance the kernel does wait and 
read/write in chunks, minimizing head-reposition over long distances, 
doesnt it? there are even tunables about swap... hi_swap and so on wich 
are realy of use...

should i benchmark where to locate and how to size it or will i only 
gain performance far from being noticeable?

Eugene



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?410997F7.30605>