Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Sat, 1 Apr 2000 20:08:28 -0800
From:      Andre Gironda <andre@sun4c.net>
To:        James Wyatt <jwyatt@rwsystems.net>
Cc:        Nate Williams <nate@yogotech.com>, Andre Gironda <andre@sun4c.net>, Jim Durham <durham@w2xo.pgh.pa.us>, freebsd-security@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject:   Re: FTP with firewall rules
Message-ID:  <20000401200828.B319@toaster.sun4c.net>
In-Reply-To: <Pine.BSF.4.10.10004011657120.71006-100000@bsdie.rwsystems.net>; from James Wyatt on Sat, Apr 01, 2000 at 05:02:17PM -0600
References:  <200004011856.LAA04865@nomad.yogotech.com> <Pine.BSF.4.10.10004011657120.71006-100000@bsdie.rwsystems.net>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help


Yes, that's exactly it.  Piercing firewalls is not always as
simple as passive vs active ftp.

Proxies are a great idea in most cases, although I think they're
a bit restrictive.  But then again, do you really want people
using programs like httptunnel and creating a potential security
problem?

Have you seen http://www.detached.net/mailtunnel.html ?

Guess that means that UUCP mail through a dial up connection
isn't really that bad of an idea.  Controlling what data is
*really* going through your network is more complex than you think.
Especially in this day and age.

dre

On Sat, Apr 01, 2000 at 05:02:17PM -0600, James Wyatt wrote:
> On Sat, 1 Apr 2000, Nate Williams wrote:
> > > export/setenv http_proxy! 
> > 
> > Huh?
> > 
> > > of course, you have to find all of the distfiles manually, since only
> > > about 4% of them have an http site to download the source from.
> > 
> > That's irrelevant.  You can still download *ALL* of them via
> > passive-mode ftp.  I have yet to find a site that didn't let me download
> > with ftp in passive mode, so if you are *truly* interested in security,
> > then you certainly don't want to open up so people can use active-mode
> > ftp from behind your firewall.
> 
> Andre said his was a special case and that "it works though, but i doubt
> it's what you are looking for. i had to do this behind a firewall/proxy
> architecture that did not allow ftp."
> 
> I took it to mean "*he* *has* to use HTTP to fetch because his firewall
> doesn't support *any* ftp" and that if there is some problem with active
> FTP it might still work. - Jy@

-- 
This program has been brought to you by the language C and the number F.



To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-security" in the body of the message




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20000401200828.B319>