Date: Tue, 10 Oct 2006 23:11:07 +0900 From: Daichi GOTO <daichi@freebsd.org> To: Daichi GOTO <daichi@freebsd.org> Cc: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org, freebsd-current@freebsd.org, ozawa@ongs.co.jp, Kris Kennaway <kris@obsecurity.org> Subject: Re: [ANN] unionfs patchset-16 release, it is ready for the merge Message-ID: <452BA9FB.3080401@freebsd.org> In-Reply-To: <452B750D.2020104@freebsd.org> References: <44B67340.1080405@freebsd.org> <44B74036.6060101@freebsd.org> <20060903170129.GA98917@xor.obsecurity.org> <20060903172033.GA99212@xor.obsecurity.org> <20060904184717.GA41475@xor.obsecurity.org> <44FD8B2B.60501@freebsd.org> <E1GXERG-000BLK-2p@cs1.cs.huji.ac.il> <452B750D.2020104@freebsd.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Daichi GOTO wrote: > Danny Braniss wrote: >> [...] >>> Yeah, we have a new patchset to solve above problem I think. >> >> any chance that the new unionfs will make it to 6.2? > > We cannot merger unionfs patch to 6.x branch. It'll just only for > -current. For 6.x patchset is just a patchset. > >> I'm using it, and it's working just fine - as opposed to the unusable >> one supplied. > > For under some heavy situation with mount_nullfs, it has a problem since > the lock mechanism. To solve that problem, we need a new API(function) > for VFS. We are discussing about it and need vfs-hackers help. > Sorry for my slow response :( > >> If not, Daichi GOTO, will you have a new set of patches? >> union_vfsops.c just changed, for example. >> thanks, >> danny > > uhmm... you need a new patchset if it is under construction? I updated new two dosuments: http://people.freebsd.org/~daichi/unionfs/reason-for-sys-uio-file.html http://people.freebsd.org/~daichi/unionfs/request-new-api-for-vfs.html Folks who have a interest in unionfs, read it please :) -- Daichi GOTO, http://people.freebsd.org/~daichi
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?452BA9FB.3080401>