Date: Fri, 29 Aug 2003 12:40:07 -0700 From: "David O'Brien" <obrien@FreeBSD.org> To: Nate Lawson <nate@root.org> Cc: cvs-all@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/gnu/usr.bin Makefile src/lib Makefile src/sbin Makefile src/usr.bin Makefile src/usr.sbin Makefile Message-ID: <20030829194007.GA69823@dragon.nuxi.com> In-Reply-To: <20030829121043.K43708@root.org> References: <200308291035.h7TAZ1Wm008611@repoman.freebsd.org> <Pine.NEB.3.96L.1030829090446.44583A-100000@fledge.watson.org> <20030829183759.GA68755@dragon.nuxi.com> <20030829121043.K43708@root.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Fri, Aug 29, 2003 at 12:14:17PM -0700, Nate Lawson wrote: > On Fri, 29 Aug 2003, David O'Brien wrote: > > On Fri, Aug 29, 2003 at 09:08:35AM -0400, Robert Watson wrote: > > > On Fri, 29 Aug 2003, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote: > > > > > > > NO_TOOLCHAIN skips Compilers and Binutils > > > > NO_USB skips USB stuff > > > > NO_VINUM skips Vinum stuff > > > > NO_ACPI skips ACPI stuff > > > > > > Great! I was hoping this would be the outcome of the Minimalist FreeBSD > > > discussion. > > > > Was there a discussion somewhere that most of us missed? > > Hmm, missed it also. In general I'm in favor of this but would prefer to > see these also defined under a single knob (MINIMAL?). I disagree that it should be a single (MINIMAL(sp?)) knob. But that there should be more discussion about it. If you have NO_TOOLCHAIN set, I can't think of a reason to have /usr/include or /usr/lib/*.a populated; for instance.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20030829194007.GA69823>