Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Tue, 12 Jan 2016 17:49:33 +0100
From:      Oliver Pinter <oliver.pinter@hardenedbsd.org>
To:        Konstantin Belousov <kostikbel@gmail.com>
Cc:        Ian Lepore <ian@freebsd.org>, Vijay Rajah <me@rvijay.me>, freebsd-questions@freebsd.org, freebsd-current@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: Need help with New Build -- Skylake
Message-ID:  <CAPQ4ffsHG4i4gyo=27nsu%2BdAD%2BchUbPDAXPgo=GC%2B0h_2NfAQw@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <20151224181308.GZ3625@kib.kiev.ua>
References:  <mailman.2556.1450906440.19558.freebsd-questions@freebsd.org> <20151224173146.H8562@sola.nimnet.asn.au> <567BA5BB.4020304@rvijay.me> <CAPQ4ffsMwHqCuCq5av7YcfN2RjXWKv7dozkrZCCQZa9t-p0UhA@mail.gmail.com> <1450970960.25138.242.camel@freebsd.org> <20151224181308.GZ3625@kib.kiev.ua>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 12/24/15, Konstantin Belousov <kostikbel@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 24, 2015 at 08:29:20AM -0700, Ian Lepore wrote:
>> We had exactly this symptom -- long delay with spincursor before
>> loading the kernel -- on arm systems when we first enabled forth in
>> loader.  The problem turned out to be the fact that loader was running
>> with instruction and data caches disabled, and it took about 90-100
>> seconds to parse the 547 lines of text (almost all useless) in
>> /boot/defaults/loader.conf.  We stripped that file down to the dozen or
>> so lines that actually needed to be there and booting became much
>> faster.  Eventually we got the caches enabled in the prior-stage
>> bootloader and it became really fast.
>
> It is highly unlikely that caches are the source of the slowness. On
> x86, we rely on the firmware (BIOS or EFI) to properly configure both
> DRAM controllers and caches. More, Intel considers the corresponding
> controllers configuration recipes as highly secret and, even for BIOS
> vendors, Intel provides the binary blob of code which does the config
> magic, instead of the documentation.
>
> That said, loader runs in the unpaged protected mode but reflects BIOS
> calls into the real mode. Quite possible, either the real mode is
> slow on SkyLakes, or even more possible, the switch between real and
> protected mode is slow, or the protected mode without paging enabled is
> slow. Or might be the PCH lacks the ISA timer.

Seem like the issue is affects the legacy boot mode, in UEFI mode the
system boots blazingly fast.
When I have more time, I try to figure out what's the problem behind this issue.

>
> A developer needs the real machine to diagnose the cause.
>



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?CAPQ4ffsHG4i4gyo=27nsu%2BdAD%2BchUbPDAXPgo=GC%2B0h_2NfAQw>