Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Fri, 5 Jan 2001 23:11:25 +0300
From:      "Artem Koutchine" <matrix@ipform.ru>
To:        "David G. Andersen" <dga@pobox.com>
Cc:        <security@FreeBSD.ORG>, <questions@FreeBSD.ORG>
Subject:   Re: Antisniffer measures (digest of posts)
Message-ID:  <002f01c07753$af808400$0c00a8c0@ipform.ru>
References:  <200101052002.NAA29203@faith.cs.utah.edu>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> > PROBABLE:
> > Some kind of tranparent IP encryprtion.
> > 
> > QUESTIONS:
> >     What kind of IP encryption?
> >     Is it availbale for FBSD, Linux, WINxxxxx?
> 
>   IPsec.  IPsec.  IPsec.  FreeBSD, Linux, Win2k support it.  Don't know
> about MacOS.  Doubt it until OSX, but I could be wrong.  This is the
> better solution.

Well, then i need IPSec for WIn9x, NT 4.x and ME too. Is there?

 
>   A final solution is simply to encrypt all sensitive traffic at the
> application layer.  Use SSL for http/pop3/etc.  Use SSH for remote
> access.  Etc.  Not perfect, but works.

Nope, dsniff breaks SSL and SSH1.

Artem



To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-security" in the body of the message




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?002f01c07753$af808400$0c00a8c0>