Date: Tue, 11 Mar 2003 11:17:34 +0100 From: Michael Nottebrock <michaelnottebrock@gmx.net> To: stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: cdcontrol via atapicam in 4.8-RC Message-ID: <200303111117.40339.michaelnottebrock@gmx.net> In-Reply-To: <20030310044541.10713.qmail@pikachu.bsp.bc.niigata-u.ac.jp> References: <20030306124454.5330.qmail@pikachu.bsp.bc.niigata-u.ac.jp> <20030309073546.A19190@panzer.kdm.org> <20030310044541.10713.qmail@pikachu.bsp.bc.niigata-u.ac.jp>
index | next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail
[-- Attachment #1 --] On Monday 10 March 2003 05:45, Mamoru Iwaki wrote: > Hopefully, it would be fixed in 4.8-RELEASE because enabling both > atapicam and atapi?? looks dangerous; i.e. it is hard to guarantee > mutually exclusive access to the device, and there is no description > in case that the device is accessed via both ways simultaneously. It's not so bad, I've run FreeBSD with both enabled even before atapicam was merged into the tree and didn't have problems - it's not so easy to manage and create a situation where two applications try accessing the two devices at the same time after all. -- Regards, Michael Nottebrock [-- Attachment #2 --] -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQA+bbfEXhc68WspdLARApPvAKCo3e9fjUpoqsFK/sJAt77Re3+suACfTJnq v6gbdWW2FZFOyYzYK1Zhxlk= =RKew -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----help
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200303111117.40339.michaelnottebrock>