Date: Tue, 28 Sep 2004 14:27:40 -0700 (PDT) From: Doug Barton <DougB@FreeBSD.org> To: Peter Schultz <pete@beforever.com> Cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: HEADS UP: named now runs chroot'ed by default Message-ID: <20040928142532.M90002@qbhto.arg> In-Reply-To: <727FCC18-1156-11D9-BBA6-000D936BE398@beforever.com> References: <20040928025635.Q5094@ync.qbhto.arg> <727FCC18-1156-11D9-BBA6-000D936BE398@beforever.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Tue, 28 Sep 2004, Peter Schultz wrote:
> Why not do it FreeBSD style and auto-jail named?
The simplest answer is that not every host can burn (or even obtain) an
extra IP address for the jail. It's also questionable what additional
benefit would be obtained.
Of course, if someone else finds the time to implement this, I will give
it a serious look. I'm not _opposed_ to the idea.
Doug
--
This .signature sanitized for your protection
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20040928142532.M90002>