Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Fri, 12 May 1995 01:27:55 -0400
From:      Charles Henrich <henrich@crh.cl.msu.edu>
Message-ID:  <199505120527.WAA00929@freefall.cdrom.com>

next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
>From henrich Fri May 12 01:26:57 1995 remote from crh
Subject: Re: Changed information for PR gnu/397
To: rgrimes@gndrsh.aac.dev.com (Rodney W. Grimes)
Date: Fri, 12 May 1995 01:26:57 -0400 (EDT)
In-Reply-To: <199505120458.VAA15555@gndrsh.aac.dev.com> from "Rodney W. Grimes" at May 11, 95 09:58:45 pm
X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4 PL23]
Content-Type: text
Content-Length: 775       
Sender: henrich

> > State-Changed-Why:
> > /home/ncvs/src/gnu/usr.bin/man/man/man.c,v  <--  man.c
> > new revision: 1.12; previous revision: 1.11
> >
>
> What do you folks think about what I just used for the reason for
> changing the status?  Basically that is a cut and paste of the
> output from the cvs commit.  I think this is what we should be
> doing instead of manually saying ``fixed in revision blah of blah''.

Works for me, although it may be construed as being a tad vague.  I.e. in all
cases does the above mean that the changes were made, or have been made
previously, or ?  What exactly (for boneheads like me) does that statement
mean?

-Crh

    Charles Henrich     Michigan State University     henrich@crh.cl.msu.edu

                     http://rs560.msu.edu/~henrich/




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199505120527.WAA00929>