Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Wed, 16 Feb 2005 17:37:23 +0100
From:      Pav Lucistnik <pav@FreeBSD.org>
To:        Dejan Lesjak <dejan.lesjak@ijs.si>
Cc:        cvs-ports@FreeBSD.org
Subject:   Re: cvs commit: ports/x11-fonts/bitstream-vera Makefile
Message-ID:  <1108571843.92209.38.camel@pav.hide.vol.cz>
In-Reply-To: <200502161729.37381.dejan.lesjak@ijs.si>
References:  <200502160511.j1G5BlVu083450@repoman.freebsd.org> <1108570685.7544.5.camel@leguin> <1108571044.92209.35.camel@pav.hide.vol.cz> <200502161729.37381.dejan.lesjak@ijs.si>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help

--=-X6xlqal5HlHkTJQ6kVsP
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO8859-2
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Dejan Lesjak p=ED=B9e v st 16. 02. 2005 v 17:29 +0100:
> On Wednesday 16 of February 2005 17:24, Pav Lucistnik wrote:
> > Eric Anholt p=ED=B9e v st 16. 02. 2005 v 08:18 -0800:
> > > On Wed, 2005-02-16 at 11:18 +0000, Alexey Dokuchaev wrote:
> > > > On Wed, Feb 16, 2005 at 12:02:10PM +0100, Pav Lucistnik wrote:
> > > > > Joe Marcus Clarke p??e v st 16. 02. 2005 v 05:11 +0000:
> > > > > > marcus      2005-02-16 05:11:47 UTC
> > > > > >
> > > > > >   FreeBSD ports repository
> > > > > >
> > > > > >   Modified files:
> > > > > >     x11-fonts/bitstream-vera Makefile
> > > > > >   Log:
> > > > > >   Use the correct plist.
> > > > >
> > > > > You think people still run XFree 3.x ?
> > > >
> > > > They might, actually.  XFree 3.x is still probably useful for peopl=
e
> > > > with old hardware/specific cards.
> > >
> > > People with cards sufficiently old to not be supported by current
> > > X.Org/XFree86 would probably be better off with the vesa driver and
> > > shadowfb instead.
> > >
> > > In fact, I don't know what cards are supported natively by 3.3.6 and =
not
> > > X.Org.  The failure of the transition to XFree86 4.0 was largely due =
to
> > > the nonexistent-to-poor s3virge support, if I remember right, and tha=
t
> > > was fixed at least a year ago.
> >
> > If I'm not mistaken, XFree 3.x ports are already removed, right?
> >
> > Is it a time to sweep code supporting 3.x out from the ports tree?
>=20
> They (or rather it) is not - see x11/XFree86. However, we could perhaps m=
ark=20
> that one as DEPRECATED, perhaps at first without expiration date and see =
if=20
> people scream...

Aaah! Here it's hiding.=20

--=20
Pav Lucistnik <pav@oook.cz>
              <pav@FreeBSD.org>

What do you mean? An African or a European swallow?

--=-X6xlqal5HlHkTJQ6kVsP
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc
Content-Description: Toto je =?iso-8859-2?Q?digit=E1ln=EC?=
	=?ISO-8859-1?Q?_podepsan=E1?= =?iso-8859-2?Q?_=E8=E1st?=
	=?ISO-8859-1?Q?_zpr=E1vy?=

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.0 (FreeBSD)

iD8DBQBCE3bDntdYP8FOsoIRAq7xAJwLNSW2eay1bJcGqu/E7uHs/OKxZwCfTtyl
U+Dx4tYFMNsYdRvRYaoX4aA=
=T6RN
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--=-X6xlqal5HlHkTJQ6kVsP--



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?1108571843.92209.38.camel>