Date: Sun, 10 Nov 2002 12:53:00 -0600 From: "Alan L. Cox" <alc@imimic.com> To: mjacob@feral.com Cc: alpha@FreeBSD.ORG, John Baldwin <jhb@FreeBSD.ORG> Subject: Re: on the same note.. Message-ID: <3DCEAB0C.F2898200@imimic.com> References: <Pine.BSF.4.21.0211100822230.59293-100000@beppo>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Matthew Jacob wrote: > > .... > > In vm_object.c you or somebody had a question about atomicity in bumping > the object generation count. What is wrong with just making that > atomic_add_int for now? I see no locks otherwise covering it. It and the other vm_object fields are generally covered by Giant. I believe that vm_object allocation and initialization are the only activities that aren't. Alan To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-alpha" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?3DCEAB0C.F2898200>