Date: Thu, 24 Feb 2011 10:55:21 GMT From: Martin Simmons <martin@lispworks.com> To: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Why is procfs deprecated in favor of procstat? Message-ID: <201102241055.p1OAtL5W024574@higson.cam.lispworks.com> In-Reply-To: <4D65C3D6.9060205@freebsd.org> (message from Julian Elischer on Wed, 23 Feb 2011 18:35:02 -0800) References: <201102211707.p1LH7c8n075660@lurza.secnetix.de> <4D65C3D6.9060205@freebsd.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
>>>>> On Wed, 23 Feb 2011 18:35:02 -0800, Julian Elischer said: > > While sysctl is 'ok' I will admit that the procfs variant is a bit > more convenient to use. > simply because you can enumerate the damned tree without seeing all > the contents. If by contents you mean values then try the sysctl -N option (though that still does a recursive enumeration). __Martin
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?201102241055.p1OAtL5W024574>