Date: Thu, 7 Feb 2008 17:29:07 -0700 From: Chad Perrin <perrin@apotheon.com> To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: OT: Whats wrong with gmail? Message-ID: <20080208002907.GB44114@demeter.hydra> In-Reply-To: <87f7f4170802070831pf619d60tecd92e9a6411f912@mail.gmail.com> References: <87f7f4170802061326t217ebeaao600f14b9d01412e6@mail.gmail.com> <20080206224832.D69257@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl> <87f7f4170802070831pf619d60tecd92e9a6411f912@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Thu, Feb 07, 2008 at 11:31:26AM -0500, Jeremy Gransden wrote: > On Feb 6, 2008 4:52 PM, Wojciech Puchar <wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl> wrote: > > > > you can get billions storing everything and closely working with > > government, and even privates - selling the data raw or processed. > > > > of course not officially, but when talking billions of $ such things, or > > honesty, truth etc. turns to "who cares". > > > > I did not think of the $ aspect. I was thinking more on a functional > level. Data can be a very lucrative business... Maybe thats where > Google makes all of its money. That makes it rather intriguing though. > > With that said, I do not consider any type of email a confidential > communication medium. If someone wants to read your email; I'm sure, > with enough hard work, they will. That's what encryption is for -- privacy. -- CCD CopyWrite Chad Perrin [ http://ccd.apotheon.org ] print substr("Just another Perl hacker", 0, -2);
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20080208002907.GB44114>