Date: Sat, 23 Nov 2019 10:56:47 +0000 From: "Bjoern A. Zeeb" <bzeeb-lists@lists.zabbadoz.net> To: "Conrad Meyer" <cem@FreeBSD.org> Cc: src-committers@freebsd.org, svn-src-all@freebsd.org, svn-src-head@freebsd.org Subject: Re: svn commit: r355024 - in head/sys: kern net sys Message-ID: <2F916664-B316-4F61-810C-31D753FAC9B2@lists.zabbadoz.net> In-Reply-To: <201911222323.xAMNNfwi027342@repo.freebsd.org> References: <201911222323.xAMNNfwi027342@repo.freebsd.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 22 Nov 2019, at 23:23, Conrad Meyer wrote: > Author: cem > Date: Fri Nov 22 23:23:40 2019 > New Revision: 355024 > URL: https://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/base/355024 > > Log: > Add explicit SI_SUB_EPOCH > > Add explicit SI_SUB_EPOCH, after SI_SUB_TASKQ and before SI_SUB_SMP > (EARLY_AP_STARTUP). Rename existing "SI_SUB_TASKQ + 1" to > SI_SUB_EPOCH. > > epoch(9) consumers cannot epoch_alloc() before > SI_SUB_EPOCH:SI_ORDER_SECOND, > but likely should allocate before SI_SUB_SMP. Prior to this change, > consumers (well, epoch itself, and net/if.c) just open-coded the > SI_SUB_TASKQ + 1 order to match epoch.c, but this was fragile. > > Reviewed by: mmacy > Differential Revision: https://reviews.freebsd.org/D22503 That’s the wrong review URL?
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?2F916664-B316-4F61-810C-31D753FAC9B2>