Date: Tue, 28 Sep 2004 14:32:49 -0700 (PDT) From: Doug Barton <DougB@FreeBSD.org> To: Rob <spamrefuse@yahoo.com> Cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Proper way to run bind9 Message-ID: <20040928143048.U90002@qbhto.arg> In-Reply-To: <4158F9ED.2090203@yahoo.com> References: <1096042856.24267.6.camel@purgatory.ceribus.net> <xzpsm97v49e.fsf@dwp.des.no> <1096064849.1047.7.camel@server.mcneil.com> <b34be84204092718334b4b77af@mail.gmail.com> <b34be84204092719407a20d83f@mail.gmail.com> <4158F9ED.2090203@yahoo.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Tue, 28 Sep 2004, Rob wrote:
> Juha Saarinen wrote:
>>
>> /etc/rc.conf
>>
>> named_enable="YES" # Run named, the DNS server (or NO).
>> named_program="/usr/sbin/named" # path to named, if you want a different
>> one.
>> named_flags="-c /etc/namedb/named.conf -u bind" # Flags for named
>
> I feel that
>
> named_flags="-c /etc/namedb/named.conf -u bind"
>
> is going to be used as the default in too many cases, that it
> should go into /etc/default/rc.conf.
Given that this is already compiled in, and therefore completely
unecessary, I don't plan to add it. This is especially meaningful when
you consider all the people that are going to have problems because they
spuriously added "-b /etc/namedb/named.conf" to their named_flags for
BIND 8.
--
This .signature sanitized for your protection
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20040928143048.U90002>