Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Sun, 27 Mar 2016 18:01:38 +0200
From:      Guido Falsi <mad@madpilot.net>
To:        Sean Bruno <sbruno@freebsd.org>, freebsd-net@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: Intel I219 V2 (if_em) Wake on LAN not working
Message-ID:  <56F803E2.1040507@madpilot.net>
In-Reply-To: <56F7FD1E.8000806@freebsd.org>
References:  <56F284A0.4050900@madpilot.net> <56F489F3.7010208@FreeBSD.org> <56F7FD1E.8000806@freebsd.org>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 03/27/16 17:32, Sean Bruno wrote:
> 
> 
>>> From that, I see that eeprom_data is 0, so adapter->wol stays
>>> zero, so ifconfig
>> doesn't show any WOL capabilities.  When I ignore the eeprom_data
>> by commenting out the "if" condition, WOL capabilities appear in
>> ifconfig.  However, even when I enable WOL with ifconfig, WOL still
>> doesn't work after a "shutdown -p now". WOL only works after I
>> power off using the power button before the kernel boots.
> 
>> Eric
> 
> 
> 
> I'm guessing that we have some kind of missing test case.  Let's start
> a bugzilla report so I can bring it to Intel's attention.

I'm going to file a bug later, I'll CC you.

> 
> I'll need a testcase as well so we can add this to regressions in the la
> b.

What do you need in the testcase? The only data I'm sure about is the
chipset I have (PCI IDs) and the fact that I'm using head r297146. Is
any further information needed?

-- 
Guido Falsi <mad@madpilot.net>



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?56F803E2.1040507>