Date: Sat, 1 Mar 2008 11:06:29 +0900 From: "Adrian Chadd" <adrian@freebsd.org> To: Chris <chrcoluk@gmail.com> Cc: freebsd-performance@freebsd.org, freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: FreeBSD bind performance in FreeBSD 7 Message-ID: <d763ac660802291806l53fcd852qb117a647ce6c93d5@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <3aaaa3a0802290854t639559b6if0adc4009997e9db@mail.gmail.com> References: <47C59591.6040600@errno.com> <BMEDLGAENEKCJFGODFOCOEHACFAA.tedm@toybox.placo.com> <3aaaa3a0802290744x25a81d68vf0ff101f6b7a819e@mail.gmail.com> <1204302128.2126.150.camel@localhost> <3aaaa3a0802290854t639559b6if0adc4009997e9db@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 01/03/2008, Chris <chrcoluk@gmail.com> wrote: > You working round what I just said. A nic should perform equally well > as it does in other operating systems just because its cheaper its not > an excuse for buggy performance. There is also other good network > cards apart from intel pro 1000. I am talking about stability not > performance, I expect a intel pro 1000 to outperform a realtek however > I expect both to be stable in terms of connectivity. I expect a > realtek in freebsd to perform as well as a realtek in windows and > linux. :) Patches please! Adrian -- Adrian Chadd - adrian@freebsd.org
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?d763ac660802291806l53fcd852qb117a647ce6c93d5>