Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Sun, 25 Oct 2015 20:42:41 +0100
From:      Christoph Brinkhaus <c.brinkhaus@t-online.de>
To:        freebsd-doc@freebsd.org
Cc:        jhs@berklix.com
Subject:   Re: [Bug 204017] man page of xrandr does not work
Message-ID:  <20151025194241.GA37947@esprimo.local>
In-Reply-To: <201510251920.t9PJKCOP015962@fire.js.berklix.net>
References:  <bug-204017-9@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/> <201510251920.t9PJKCOP015962@fire.js.berklix.net>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sun, Oct 25, 2015 at 08:20:12PM +0100, Julian H. Stacey wrote:
> Hi, Reference:
> > From:		bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org
> > Date:		Sun, 25 Oct 2015 18:19:26 +0000
> 
> bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org wrote:
> > https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=204017
> > 
> >             Bug ID: 204017
> >            Summary: man page of xrandr does not work
> >            Product: Documentation
> >            Version: Latest
> >           Hardware: Any
> >                 OS: Any
> >             Status: New
> >           Severity: Affects Many People
> >           Priority: ---
> >          Component: Documentation
> >           Assignee: freebsd-doc@FreeBSD.org
> >           Reporter: c.brinkhaus@t-online.de
> > 
> > https://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/x-config.html
> > section 5.4 liks to xrandr(1). Clicking to the link opens
> > https://www.freebsd.org/cgi/man.cgi?query=xrandr&sektion=1 with the result
> > 
> > Sorry, no data found for `xrandr(1)'. Please try a keyword search.
> > You may look for other FreeBSD Search Services.
> > 
> > I did not found a man page of xrandr.
> 
> /usr/ports/x11/xrandr 
> PS Its a nice util.

Dear Julian,

the issue is more or less my fault because I was not aware
that I have the option to change the man page query to +ports.

On the other hand it would be nice if the man page would appear
without having to change the default options.

Should I mark the bug as closed because it is not a real bug?
Or should I leave it untouched because the behaviour is not as expected?

Kind regards,

Christoph



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20151025194241.GA37947>