Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Mon, 28 Apr 2003 19:09:13 +0200 (CEST)
From:      Oliver Fromme <olli@secnetix.de>
To:        freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject:   Re: x86-64 support
Message-ID:  <200304281709.h3SH9Dau034148@lurza.secnetix.de>
In-Reply-To: <20030428175010.K77005@woozle.rinet.ru>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Dmitry Morozovsky <marck@rinet.ru> wrote:
 > In your particular case it does not work, at least under -stable (2.95);
 > moreover, it produces different (both wrong ;) output for -O and -O0 cases.
 > 
 > Actually, it's all because f[] isn't large enough ;-)

Yeah, sorry, I pasted from two different versions and
borked it.  It _does_ work, though, if the array is as
big as the counter initialization.  :-)

Regards
   Oliver

-- 
Oliver Fromme, secnetix GmbH & Co KG, Oettingenstr. 2, 80538 München
Any opinions expressed in this message may be personal to the author
and may not necessarily reflect the opinions of secnetix in any way.

"Any sufficiently advanced technology is indistinguishable from magic."
Arthur C. Clarke's Third Law, from Profiles of the Future



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200304281709.h3SH9Dau034148>