Date: Sat, 02 Nov 2002 20:42:35 +0000 From: Mark Murray <mark@grondar.org> To: Steve Kargl <sgk@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> Cc: freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: __sF Message-ID: <200211022042.gA2KgZd0086562@grimreaper.grondar.org> In-Reply-To: <20021102192432.GC28971@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> ; from Steve Kargl <sgk@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> "Sat, 02 Nov 2002 11:24:32 PST." References: <20021102192432.GC28971@troutmask.apl.washington.edu>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> > By the time __sF is mainstream, I guess the vendor will have adapted > > their product to match. Win, win. > > > > No, it does not just work. The NAG f95 compiler generates a > C file. The C file is compiled by gcc. How about "much effort"? there _has_ to be some kind of way to specify which C library to use. M -- o Mark Murray \_ O.\_ Warning: this .sig is umop ap!sdn To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200211022042.gA2KgZd0086562>