Date: Mon, 18 Oct 2004 13:27:47 +0400 From: Andrey Chernov <ache@nagual.pp.ru> To: Ruslan Ermilov <ru@FreeBSD.ORG>, src-committers@FreeBSD.ORG, cvs-src@FreeBSD.ORG, cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/gnu/lib/libreadline/readline Makefile Message-ID: <20041018092747.GB59835@nagual.pp.ru> In-Reply-To: <20041018092347.GA59835@nagual.pp.ru> References: <200410180836.i9I8afRS060144@repoman.freebsd.org> <20041018090314.GA86525@ip.net.ua> <20041018090550.GA59302@nagual.pp.ru> <20041018091004.GC86525@ip.net.ua> <20041018091303.GC59302@nagual.pp.ru> <20041018091903.GD86525@ip.net.ua> <20041018092347.GA59835@nagual.pp.ru>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
[-- Attachment #1 --] On Mon, Oct 18, 2004 at 01:23:47PM +0400, Andrey Chernov wrote: > In theory we can switch to another *curses, or make termcap as separate > library (even derived from ncurses, subset) to save lots of static linking > space. In all such cases in my variant we don't need to touch anything, > but in yours mass Makefiles rewriting required. In other words: libraries and applications are linked to termcap, without knowing its implementation details. It is good, because things can be changed on the fly without any editing. But you insist that they MUST know implementation details. I see no reason for it. -- Andrey Chernov | http://ache.pp.ru/ [-- Attachment #2 --] -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.6 (FreeBSD) iQCVAwUBQXOMk+JgpPLZnQjrAQHPVQP/ZeBR/UuEQB9eLYc81qNxlEXIHng7eKB+ ba4Dn5R59aFDT4J2SzZGUQMtcqCxaPuIv60rC+MwtVAQIK5HuhNLI9PAzizU0LL7 uokCvoJN/+igJmIqFZ1UmgBdKxes/CPmF7xeOilcObEFqETuSnB3QTzbdYd5p4Qh mjW3a0y3Kz4= =WD46 -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20041018092747.GB59835>