Date: Wed, 05 Apr 2017 16:37:00 +0100 From: John <tech-lists@zyxst.net> To: freebsd-arm@freebsd.org Subject: Re: SoC with multiple ethernet ports Message-ID: <1491406620.3919145.935191416.11687171@webmail.messagingengine.com> In-Reply-To: <12078642-77BD-4B96-87F0-4B777EABA252@astro.gla.ac.uk> References: <12078642-77BD-4B96-87F0-4B777EABA252@astro.gla.ac.uk>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Wed, 5 Apr 2017, at 16:26, Norman Gray wrote: > > Greetings. > > I'm looking for a SoC (or other small) machine to act as a gateway > between two physical networks (in fact, an ordinary one and an IPMI). > Thus I'm looking for such a device which has at least two ethernet > interfaces, and can run FreeBSD. > > There are multiple boards listed at > <https://wiki.freebsd.org/FreeBSD/arm>, but the boards under the 'Well > supported boards' headings appear only to have single interfaces (though > I wouldn't claim an exhaustive search). > > I can see what appear to be nice multiple-interface boards at > <https://www.solid-run.com/marvell-armada-family/>, but they're listed > under 'unknown support'. I can see some notes on some Marvell boards at > <https://wiki.freebsd.org/FreeBSDMarvell>, but these refer to FreeBSD > 8.x and 9-CURRENT, so are clearly not up-to-date. > > Searching the list archives, I find > <https://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-arm/2015-February/010300.html> > that at least some people are using 11.0-CURRENT on an Armada/Marvell > board, but (given that that's a bug report) I'm not sure if that usage > counts as ...Brave or not. > > There's clearly a lot of hardware possibilities here, but I surely can't > be the first person to want such a device. Does anyone on this list > have any advice? > See my thread of 3rd April ;) -- J. tech-lists@zyxst.net
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?1491406620.3919145.935191416.11687171>