Date: Fri, 14 Nov 2003 01:01:17 +0100 From: Harald Schmalzbauer <h@schmalzbauer.de> To: Jeff Roberson <jroberson@chesapeake.net> Cc: current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: ULE and very bad responsiveness Message-ID: <200311140101.23821@harrymail> In-Reply-To: <20031113162411.H10222-100000@mail.chesapeake.net> References: <20031113162411.H10222-100000@mail.chesapeake.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--Boundary-02=_TtBt/pGPwilDcOp Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-15" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Description: signed data Content-Disposition: inline On Thursday 13 November 2003 22:25, Jeff Roberson wrote: > On Thu, 13 Nov 2003, Harald Schmalzbauer wrote: > > On Thursday 13 November 2003 07:17, Harald Schmalzbauer wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > > > from comp.unix.bsd.freebsd.misc: > > > > > > Kris Kennaway wrote: > > > > On 2003-11-13, Harald Schmalzbauer <news@schmalzbauer.de> wrote: > > > >> Well, I don't have any measurements but in my case it's not > > > >> neccessary at all. I built a UP kernel with ULE like Kris advised > > > >> me. > > > > > > > > Are you running an up-to-date 5.1-CURRENT? ULE was broken with the= se > > > > characteristics until very recently. If you're up-to-date and still > > > > see these problems, you need to post to the current mailing list. > > > > > > > > Kris > > > > > > Yes, I am running current as of 13. Nov. > > > > > > Find attached my first problem description. > > > > This time I also attached my dmesg and kernel conf > > Try running seti with nice +20 rather than 15. Do you experience bad > interactivity without seti running? No, without seti everythin seems to be fine except that I cannot watch two= =20 movies at the same time which is no problem with the old scheduler. I alrea= dy=20 switched back from ULE to the old because at the moment ULE makes working=20 exhausting. I also could play quake(2) and have something compiling in the background b= ut=20 I see every new object file in form of a picture freeze. Also every other=20 disk access seems to block the whole machine for a moment. I'll try again if somebody has an idea what's wrong. Then I can try running= =20 seti wtih nice 20 but that's not really a solution. It's working perfectly= =20 with nice 15 and the old scheduler. Thanks, =2DHarry > > Thanks, > Jeff > > > > Thanks, > > > > > > -Harry > > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-current-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" --Boundary-02=_TtBt/pGPwilDcOp Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Description: signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQA/tBtTBylq0S4AzzwRAvJcAKCMEUqLIYir2Ijv0473RBuHPENaQwCfWJja MqtkTJdgDubjXsMfbjTIEPw= =xi4p -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Boundary-02=_TtBt/pGPwilDcOp--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200311140101.23821>