Date: Tue, 26 Aug 2014 09:57:38 +0200 From: John Marino <freebsd.contact@marino.st> To: Alexey Dokuchaev <danfe@FreeBSD.org>, marino@freebsd.org Cc: svn-ports-head@freebsd.org, Olivier Duchateau <olivierd@FreeBSD.org>, svn-ports-all@freebsd.org, ports-committers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: svn commit: r366190 - head/x11/keybinder Message-ID: <53FC3DF2.3000504@marino.st> In-Reply-To: <20140826075043.GA51371@FreeBSD.org> References: <201408260423.s7Q4Nh9v040747@svn.freebsd.org> <53FC289D.4080409@marino.st> <20140826075043.GA51371@FreeBSD.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 8/26/2014 09:50, Alexey Dokuchaev wrote: > On Tue, Aug 26, 2014 at 08:26:37AM +0200, John Marino wrote: >> On 8/26/2014 06:23, Olivier Duchateau wrote: >>> New Revision: 366190 >>> URL: http://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/ports/366190 >>> >>> Log: >>> - Pass maintainership >>> >>> [...] >> >> Wait, what's going on here? >> >> I understand there's a policy not to add new ports with >> "ports@FreeBSD.org" as the maintainer. >> >> This commit coupled with the previous "add port" commit appears to >> circumvent that policy. > > `x11/keybinder' is an old port, added by me back in 2011. I don't see > why Olivier cannot part with it. > > AFAIR this port rarely required much of maintenance anyways. I see what's going on. Right before this, he added "x11/keybinder-gtk3" I thought this was the same port... basically I thought he added a new port and immediately released to to ports@FreeBSD.org. That's a trend I don't want to see start. So the misunderstanding is on my side, sorry. John
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?53FC3DF2.3000504>