Date: Mon, 05 Mar 2001 16:23:26 -0700 From: Drew Eckhardt <drew@PoohSticks.ORG> To: Alfred Perlstein <bright@wintelcom.net> Cc: hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: fixing flex definitions? Message-ID: <200103052323.f25NNQn26752@chopper.Poohsticks.ORG> In-Reply-To: Your message of "Mon, 05 Mar 2001 14:48:23 PST." <20010305144823.B8663@fw.wintelcom.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
In message <20010305144823.B8663@fw.wintelcom.net>, bright@wintelcom.net writes : >Would this be an ok fix? I'm worried about the YY_PROTO() messing >things up anyone know what the point of doing it this way is? Compatability with pre-ANSI 'C' compilers, just like __P from /usr/include/sys/cdefs.h. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200103052323.f25NNQn26752>