Date: Tue, 21 Dec 2004 15:23:54 -0800 From: Kris Kennaway <kris@obsecurity.org> To: Scott Long <scottl@freebsd.org> Cc: Robert Watson <rwatson@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: Forcefully unmounting devfs... Message-ID: <20041221232354.GA28374@xor.obsecurity.org> In-Reply-To: <41C89672.3000808@freebsd.org> References: <84301.1103663813@critter.freebsd.dk> <41C89672.3000808@freebsd.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--W/nzBZO5zC0uMSeA Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Tue, Dec 21, 2004 at 02:32:34PM -0700, Scott Long wrote: > >Either disable forceful unmount of devfs, which makes sense from > >KISS and many other principles, and then jail wardens will have to > >find other ways to clean up their jails > >The more I think about it, the more I lean towards the first option. > > >=20 > I think that I'd agree here from the point of view of finding an=20 > expedient way to keep from shooting off feet. Unfortunately that's going to cause me a fair amount of pain, unless there's a simple way to kill all processes running in a given chroot (NB: I don't currently use jails because a number of ports won't build in a jail) so I can free up the devfs and then unmount it. Kris --W/nzBZO5zC0uMSeA Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.6 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFByLCKWry0BWjoQKURAjWxAKCmeNLmkEFmdVVqzwBqV0BkkD5ZzACgwhOC 1F/zAZ+GqD46r0vwl+nmGhw= =Fu5I -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --W/nzBZO5zC0uMSeA--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20041221232354.GA28374>