Date: Thu, 6 May 2004 17:03:35 -0700 (PDT) From: Julian Elischer <julian@elischer.org> To: Sam Leffler <sam@errno.com> Cc: Andre Oppermann <andre@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: Default behaviour of IP Options processing Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.4.21.0405061702000.82978-100000@InterJet.elischer.org> In-Reply-To: <200405061653.36981.sam@errno.com>
index | next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail
On Thu, 6 May 2004, Sam Leffler wrote: > > For fine-grained selection packet filtering is the better solution. This is a > simple, much lighterweight, mechanism that doesn't require touching every > packet. I would only do the tests if the packet HAD an ip option.. either way I'm not going to scream about it.. just my thoughts on the matter..home | help
Want to link to this message? Use this
URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.BSF.4.21.0405061702000.82978-100000>