Date: Tue, 3 Sep 1996 15:07:07 -0600 (MDT) From: Nate Williams <nate@mt.sri.com> To: Warner Losh <imp@village.org> Cc: Jake Hamby <jehamby@lightside.com>, hackers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: FreeBSD vs. Linux 96 (my impressions) Message-ID: <199609032107.PAA26936@rocky.mt.sri.com> In-Reply-To: <199609032023.OAA27886@rover.village.org> References: <199609032023.OAA27886@rover.village.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> : Advantage: Linux supports the Amiga filesystem. Pretty cool since I > : happened to have an Amiga-formatted Zip disk lying around! The > > NetBSD and OpenBSD have something called adosfs. I don't know if it > is endian clean or not. I don't know the effort of porting to > FreeBSD, but that might not be a bad place to start if someone was > wanting this bad enough... I *highly* suspect that the Net/OpenBSD code is at least as robust as the code in Linux. At last one of the Linux-Amiga hackers switched over to using NetBSD when it became more feasible, so the NetBSD code is going to be pretty good. (The Amiga hacker I know is *very* capable). Nate
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199609032107.PAA26936>